Case Study 02 · System Comparison

2000 CMH — InAir ERV+DX vs InAir ERV vs Decentralised Competitor

For large villas and bungalows (6,000–8,000 sq ft), fresh air requirement typically reaches ~2,000 CMH. This analysis compares three approaches head-to-head on energy costs, installation complexity, and Indian suitability.

InAir case study: 2000 CMH — InAir ERV+DX vs InAir ERV vs Decentralised Competitor
₹24K
Monthly savings — ERV+DX vs no ERV
85%
Max AC load reduction — ERV+DX
1 unit
vs 4–8 units required by competitor brands
HVAC Load Without ERV
~10.2 kW
Fresh air load (~3 TR)
₹30,600
Monthly cost (at ₹10/kWh)
Energy Comparison — Monthly
SystemMonthly CostMonthly SavingAnnual Saving
InAir ERV+DX (2000 CMH)₹6,000₹24,000₹2.9 lakh
InAir ERV (2000 CMH)₹14,400₹16,000₹1.9 lakh
Decentralised competitor (4–8 units)₹18–21,000₹9–12,000₹1.2 lakh
No ERV (baseline)₹30,600——
Product Comparison Table
ParameterInAir ERV+DXInAir ERVDecentralised Competitor
System typeCentralizedCentralizedDecentralized
Units required1 unit1 unit4–8 units
DX Cooling✓ Yes✗ No✗ No
Dehumidification✓ Active✗ No✗ No
AC Load Reduction70–85%50–60%30–50%
CO₂-based DCV✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ Not integrated
IAQ Sensors✓ Full suite✓ Full suite✗ Not integrated
PUF Insulation✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ Not standard
EC Motors✓ High efficiency✓ YesMixed / AC motors
Indian conditions✓ Designed for✓ Designed forNot calibrated for Indian conditions
InstallationClean centralizedClean centralizedMultiple penetrations
MaintenanceSingle pointSingle pointMultiple service points
"At 2000 CMH, ventilation is no longer a small-room problem — it becomes a system design problem. A single intelligent system consistently outperforms multiple independent units."
Want a custom analysis for your space?

We'll model your space
before we sell you anything.

Get a free site survey and receive a detailed analysis — airflow, energy savings, payback period — for your specific home or building.